Ok guys im new here anyways while I was browsing the internet I saw a thread that said "Ask a pedophile"now like many of you I was quite sickened.
But I read on page one where someone tried to compare attraction to animals to attraction to children.And as a person attracted to animals,that REALLY offended me and pissed me off.
First off people attracted to children,are sick and it is unhealthy.
Children CANNOT consent,and sex with a child would harm the child plus pedophillia is a sexuality disorder.
Now as for people attracted to animals(beasility/zoophilia)our attraction involves ADULT animals,and adult animals can consent.
Sex with a animal doesnt harm it,as animals are physically stronger then humans.
Now I know many of you may say since animals cannot talk how do you know they like it?
Simple we go by their REACTIONS,since animals cannot talk we go by their reactions and if an animal doesnt like something we can tell by their reactions.
Now for those against sex with animals,or think sex with an animal is wrong,please provide proof because I can assure sex with an animal isnt animal abuse and should be the last thing we should worry about.
We kill them,hunt them,force them to be our property sex with them is the last thign people should be worried about them.
And its hard for a human to abuse an animal,find me a human who can abuse a 900 pound gorilla or a 1,000 pound horse.
Most likely the animals can harm the human.
Now attraction for animals is considered a sexual ortiention like homosexuality and heterosexuality.
So for those who use arguement to compare pedophillia to homosexuality or zoosexuality it doesnt work.
Homosexuality involves between two consenting adults.
Zoosexuality involves between two consenting adult human and adult animal.
And notice how pedophile isnt called pedosexuality??
My point made.
Read this from wikipedia
"Zoosexuality is a term covering sexual orientation towards animals.
It has been in use informally since at least the 1980s, and has become more commonly referenced in scientific research literature since Hani Miletski's research into the field in the 1990s. It has become the accepted term for the sexual orientation, used within the sciences of anthrozoology, sexology and psychology, although it is not in widespread cultural use elsewhere.
Zoosexuality is a value-neutral term covering the spectrum of human-animal sexuality, and implies nothing more than a person with an orientation towards animals. This may be loving or violent, incidental intermittent or long term, actual or wished-for, fantasy or reality, and may in fact also be sexual or non-sexual in nature. Also, similarly to other orientations such as homosexuality and heterosexuality, it may be "exclusive" in nature, or one of a range of sexual focuses - the person may have human partners as well, and their relationships may be authentically relational or otherwise.
The debate over whether zoosexuality should be seen as aberration or orientation is a controversial one outside the field and in popular culture."
quote:Originally posted by Trenchant_Troll Nothing controversial whatsoever. It is an accepted fact that people that have sex with animals should be buried up to their necks in a field and driven over with with a combine.
Why so you concered what two consenting adults do?
It isnt harming anyone,your comments just show hatred and anger.
And it amazes me I deal with people like you almost on a daily basis.
quote:Originally posted by Goedile There's a simple way to figure out consent. Children and animals will bite you if you make them uncomfortable. As long as they don't bite you, they are fully enjoying your sexual escapades.
First of all children CANNOT consent or enjoy ANY type of sexual acts with an adult it is mostly harmful.
If an adult touches a child,the child will not know how to re-act due to be undeveloped.
Now for a animals(of course with ADULT animals),it depends on the reaction of the animal,if the man touches a wrong animal that doesnt like his sexual act it will bite him or worse or even kill him.
But if the animal doesnt make a negative reaction and enjoys the pleasure then no harm is being done.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Zoosexuality is NO way near pedophillia
quote:Originally posted by Roshigoth Whips and chains and things that bring pain, baby.
If you can dominate and domesticate it, you can easily sexually abuse it. Tie it down so it can't move, and it can't resist whatever you decide to do to it, be that ride it or fuck it.
For that matter, for a domesticated animal that's been basically raised and trained to submit and obey, how can you be so certain that its "consent" isn't merely submission to its slave master?
Yes it depends which animal that be sexual abused.But you have to remeber when dealing with animals we are dealing with creatures,that are powerful and normally will make reactions to stuff they dont like.
You can abuse an animal all day long,but an animal has its limits and it has instinct it will try to harm the human if it is being harmed.
But it depends which animal the person is tieing down and raping,if a human is raping an animal that is animal cruelty and ITS ILLEGAL the person should be fully forced to go to prison and face the law.
This can also be applied for humans a man can easly tie a woman and force her to obey his commands.
But now if the man is trying to do this on a large animal like a horse,or elephant ITS IMPOSSIBLE for him to die it down and rape it as for the animal will KILL HIM.
quote:Originally posted by jamespeterson First of all children CANNOT consent or enjoy ANY type of sexual acts with an adult it is mostly harmful.
Yes, children can consent. More so than animals, because even a two year old is more mentally developed than a horse. They can cognitively reason between bad touch and good touch. They are not mindless automatons, they will break rules for selfish enrichment.
Ever try to ride a wild horse? Ever try to fuck a wild horse?
I'm guessing not. In both cases, you're going to domesticated animals, taught since birth to obey their human masters. Chances are, you taught the horse much of that yourself.
Sex with a horse might not harm it any more than riding it does. Doesn't mean it likes it. Just means it's learned to put up with it.
And yes, you can sufficiently tie down a horse so it can't move. Just takes bigger chains. But the whole "can you abuse a big animal" discussion is really just a side point to your argument.
Anyway, you keep telling yourself that the horse really likes it, and that the fact that it's not bucking and screaming is because it consents, and not because it's following its learned behavior to submit to its master. Whatever makes you sleep better at night.
quote:Originally posted by Goedile Yes, children can consent. More so than animals, because even a two year old is more mentally developed than a horse. They can cognitively reason between bad touch and good touch. They are not mindless automatons, they will break rules for selfish enrichment.
No children CANNOT consent,remeber these are children who have not reached puberty.
A child having sex with an adult(as proven by many researchers)can damage the child physically and mentally as the child's mind and sexuality isnt developed.
As for the horse,if its an ADULT horse it can consent and carry on a family(why they can get pregant)as for a child they may be more mentally developed then an animal but they are NOT sexually more developed then animal.
Children's sexuality havent developed at a certain age its why we have age of consent.
And any touch of a child good or bad can damage the child and it is molestation!
But if your horse butt fucks you and you die then didn't the horse kill you? But then you chose to be deadded so would that be suicide? But the horse liked it alot so wouldn't that mean that every person that would ride that horse,that horse will take him to a secluded area and fuck him to death? And how would we really know if his screams were of pleasure or pain?